Whether School is responsible if a School Student die at School Campus --- Hon'ble Justice G.R. Swaminthan held ---If there is any indiscipline in the institution and if anything amiss occurs, it is the School that is directly responsible. The petitioner's son is a victim of indiscipline of one of the students. Therefore, it is the School that has to pay for the unfortunate event. Since it is a Government School, the Government of Tamil Nadu will have to assume responsibility to pay compensation to the writ petitioner.
Moot Point: Whether School is responsible if a School Student die at School Campus --- Hon'ble Justice G.R. Swaminthan held ---If there is any indiscipline in the institution and if anything amiss occurs, it is the School that is directly responsible. The petitioner's son is a victim of indiscipline of one of the students. Therefore, it is the School that has to pay for the unfortunate event. Since it is a Government School, the Government of Tamil Nadu will have to assume responsibility to pay compensation to the writ petitioner.
If there is any
indiscipline in the institution and if anything amiss occurs, it is the
School that is directly responsible. The petitioner's son is a victim of
indiscipline of one of the students. Therefore, it is the School that has
to pay for the unfortunate event. Since it is a Government School, the
Government of Tamil Nadu will have to assume responsibility to pay
compensation to the writ petitioner.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P.(MD)No.5807 of 2015
Asaiyan ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
School Education Department,
Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director of School Education,
College Road,
Chennai-600 006.
3.The District Collector,
Dindigul District,
Dindigul-624 004.
4.The Chief Education Officer,
Palani Road, Dindigul,
Dindigul 624 001.
5.The Joint Director,
Kallar Reclamation,
Old Ramnad Collector Office Building,
Madurai-625020.
6.The Head Master,
Government Kallar Higher Secondary School,
Vilampatti,
Nilakottai Taluk,
Dindigul District-624 219. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pay a sum
of Rs.20,00,000/- (Twenty Lakhs only) by way of compensation for
the death of the petitioner's son namely Vinoth who died in the 6th
respondents School Campus due to the negligent act of the School
administration within a stipulated time.
For Petitioner : Mr.R . Karunanidhi
For Respondents : Mr.S.Srimathy, Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. The writ petitioner belongs to Vannaar community, which
comes under the category of Most Backward Class. His elder son
namely Vinoth was studying in XI standard in Computer Science
group at Kallar Government Higher Secondary School, Vilampatti
Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. His second son was also
studying in the same School. While so, on 12.11.2014 at about
11.00 am., the writ petitioner received a call from the School and he
was informed that his elder son Vinoth was in an unconscious
condition. The writ petitioner rushed to the School and found that
his son was dead by then. It later transpired that the petitioner's
elder son was brutally attacked by his classmate by name
Sundarapandi and as a result of the said assault on the head of the
writ petitioner's son, he died. In this regard, First Information
Report was registered in Crime No.45 of 2014 on the file of
Vilampatti police station. The petitioner has filed this writ petition
demanding payment of compensation.
3. The respondents have filed a detailed counter affidavit. The
learned Special Government Pleader reiterated the contentions set
out therein.
4. The stand of the respondents is two fold. The first
contention is that this writ petition itself would not lie and that the
petitioner will have to workout his remedies before the civil Court.
In this regard, the learned Special Government Pleader placed
reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in
W.A(MD).No.1030 of 2017 dated 04.10.2018. She would further
contend that the School cannot blame for the unfortunate happening
that is said to have taken place during the intermission session.
5. I carefully considered the rival contentions. It is not in
dispute that the petitioner's son Vinoth was a student, who was
studying XI standard in the sixth respondent School. It is also not
disputed that the death of Vinoth took place in the School Campus on
a working day. When the facts are not in disputed, I do not think the
claimant should be relegated to move the Civil Court. Only, when
there is a factual controversy, the parties will have to go before the
civil Court. In this case, what is to be determined is the question of
liability of the respondents. The learned Special Government Pleader
would contend that the School cannot be blamed for the outcome of a
private scuffle between the two students.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner placed
reliance on the decision reported in (2008) 8 MLJ 1085
(P.N.Kanagaraj Vs Chief Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu). The
principle laid down therein furnishes a direct answer to the question
raised by the respondents. In paragraph 13 of the said decision, a
learned judge of this Court held that the Principal or the Headmaster
of an Education Institution is responsible for the discipline in the
institution, apart from maintaining quality of education as well as the
the functional efficiency. Therefore, it is a question of absolute
liability. It is not a question of whether the School Headmaster was
negligent or not. This Court has categorically held that he is
responsible for the discipline in the institution. If there is any
indiscipline in the institution and if anything amiss occurs, it is the
School that is directly responsible. The petitioner's son is a victim of
indiscipline of one of the students. Therefore, it is the School that has
to pay for the unfortunate event. Since it is a Government School, the
Government of Tamil Nadu will have to assume responsibility to pay
compensation to the writ petitioner.
7. The writ petitioner states that he is a daily wager. His entire
future rested on the prospects of his elder son. The petitioner's
dreams have been brutally shattered. Therefore, I am of the view
that the first respondent should pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees
Five Lakhs only) as compensation to the writ petitioner. The first
respondent shall take two demand drafts one for a sum of
Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only) in favour
of the writ petitioner and the other in favour of his wife for the
balance amount. It is directed that a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees
Two Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only) shall remain in the name of the
writ petitioner's wife for a period of three years. The petitioner's
wife shall be entitled to withdraw the accrued interest once in three
months. The said amount will be disbursed within a period of eight
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the first
respondent does not pay the compensation within a period of eight
weeks, it will carry interest at the rate of 7.5% form the date of filing
of this writ petition.
8. The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.
1.The Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
School Education Department,
Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director of School Education,
College Road,
Chennai-600 006.
3.The District Collector,
Dindigul District,
Dindigul-624 004.
4.The Chief Education Officer,
Palani Road, Dindigul,
Dindigul 624 001.
5.The Joint Director,
Kallar Reclamation,
Old Ramnad Collector Office Building,
Madurai-625020.
6.The Head Master,
Government Kallar Higher Secondary School,
Vilampatti,
Nilakottai Taluk,
Dindigul District-624 219.
*******************************************************************
R. KARUNANIDHI,
ADVOCATE
Plot No: 12A/ 59, Muthu Vinayaga Nagar
Near Madurai High Court Bench
Plot No: 12A/ 59, Muthu Vinayaga Nagar
Near Madurai High Court Bench
Ulaganeri, Uthangudi post
Madurai- 625 107
Tamil Nadu, India
Mobile: +91- 9994513250
Madurai- 625 107
Tamil Nadu, India
Mobile: +91- 9994513250
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Success isn't always about greatness. It's about consistency. Consistent hard work leads to success. Greatness will come.”
—Dwayne Johnson (born 1972)
Comments
Post a Comment