ADVOCATE R. KARUNANIDHI, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court

Journey for Justice: A Collective Effort that Reclaimed School Land A legal battle does not end within the pages of books. It reaches completion only when it steps into the field and resonates as the voice of an ordinary citizen. In my legal career, this Public Interest Litigation (PIL), which I pursued on behalf of Mr. Balasubramaniam, gave me immense satisfaction both as a lawyer and as a human being. Challenges Faced: The land belonging to a government school had been encroached upon, and houses had been constructed around it. In such a situation, Mr. Balasubramaniam remained firmly determined to reclaim the land. His strong commitment to public interest became a great source of inspiration for me as well. I appeared on his behalf and conducted the case. Strength of the Legal Battle: While arguing the case before the High Court, gathering proper documents and legally establishing the boundaries of the school property posed significant challenges. However, we firmly placed befor...

நீதிக்கான பயணம்: பள்ளி நிலத்தை மீட்டெடுத்த ஒரு கூட்டு முயற்சி! சட்டப் போராட்டம் என்பது எப்போதும் புத்தகங்களில் மட்டும் முடிந்துவிடுவதில்லை. அது களத்தில் இறங்கி, ஒரு சாமானிய மனிதரின் குரலாக ஒலிக்கும்போதுதான் முழுமை பெறுகிறது. எனது சட்ட வாழ்க்கையில், திரு. பாலசுப்ரமணியம் அவர்களுக்காக நான் முன்னெடுத்த இந்த பொதுநல வழக்கு (PIL), எனக்கு ஒரு வழக்கறிஞராகவும், மனிதனாகவும் மிகப்பெரிய ஆத்ம திருப்தியைத் தந்தது. எதிர்கொண்ட சவால்கள்: அரசுப் பள்ளியின் நிலம் ஆக்கிரமிக்கப்பட்டு, அதைச் சுற்றி வீடுகள் கட்டப்பட்டிருந்த சூழலில், அந்த நிலத்தை மீட்டெடுக்க வேண்டும் என்பதில் திரு. பாலசுப்ரமணியம் அவர்கள் மிகவும் உறுதியாக இருந்தார். ஒரு பொதுநலனை முன்வைத்து அவர் காட்டிய அந்த உறுதி, எனக்கும் மிகப்பெரிய உத்வேகத்தைக் கொடுத்தது. அவருக்காக நான் ஆஜராகி, அந்த வழக்கை நடத்தினேன். சட்டப் போராட்டத்தின் பலம்: உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் இந்த வழக்கை வாதாடியபோது, ஆவணங்களைச் சரியாகத் திரட்டுவதும், பள்ளியின் எல்லைகளைச் சட்டப்பூர்வமாக நிரூபிப்பதும் மிகப்பெரிய சவாலாக இருந்தது. ஆனால், 'கல்விக்கூடம் என்பது அடுத்த தலைமுறையின் சொத...

Section 35 BNSS Does Not Empower Police To Summon Or Question A Person Without Registering Case: Madras HC Quashes Notice Issued To Journalist The petitioner approached the Madras High Court seeking quashing of the impugned notice issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police under Section 35(3) of BNS, 2023. ByTulip Kanth|12 Jan 2026 6:30 PM Section 35 BNSS Does Not Empower Police To Summon Or Question A Person Without Registering Case: Madras HC Quashes Notice Issued To Journalist Justice Sunder Mohan, Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) While quashing a notice of the police summoning a man for his alleged defamatory statements made in a journal, the Madras High Court has held that section 35(1)(b) of the BNSS only specifies the circumstances under which a Police Officer may arrest a person without a warrant and does not empower the Officials to summon or question the person in the absence of any case registered against him. The petitioner approached the High Court seeking quashing of ...

Advocate R. Karunanidhi has Appeared for the Petitioner in this case. Acquittal Entitles Employee to Full Pay for Suspension Period: Madras HC Directs TANGEDCO to Treat Suspension as Duty Read more: https://lawtrend.in/acquittal-entitles-employee-to-full-pay-for-suspension-period-madras-hc-directs-tangedco-to-treat-suspension-as-duty/ Importance of the Judgment: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that mere issuance or pendency of incidental or minor charges during the period of suspension cannot defeat an employee’s right to full service and monetary benefits, when the criminal case forming the basis of suspension ends in acquittal and no punishment ultimately survives. The Court further held that an employee acquitted in a criminal case is entitled to have the entire period of suspension treated as duty with full pay and allowances. Revocation of suspension followed by permission to retire amounts to deemed reinstatement, and the principle of “no work, no pay” ha...

The Madras High Court was considering a Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the respondent Police Officials to initiate appropriate action in an alleged case of police brutality. https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2627303101087907782/5165373426298054538 https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/thavakannan-v-the-director-general-of-police-allegation-disciplinary-proceedings-fir-custodial-assault-1602585 The Madras High Court has ordered the registration of an FIR against 2 police officers in an alleged case of custodial assault and police brutality. The High Court held that the allegations in the charge in disciplinary proceedings constituted cognizable offences. The High Court was considering a Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the respondent Police Officials to initiate appropriate legal and criminal action based on the petitioner’s representation regarding the brutal...